Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson publicly accused the Supreme Court’s conservative majority of injecting “chaos and uncertainty” into the 2026 midterm elections after the Court, on its emergency docket, lifted one of two injunctions blocking President Trump’s executive order restricting mail voting. Jackson’s central objection was procedural as much as substantive: the Court allowed the administration to continue implementing the order even though no judge or justice had yet concluded that the order was constitutional. Voting-rights organizations argued that the ruling functionally permits an untested executive directive to reshape state-run mail voting systems weeks before ballots are mailed. The case is a significant example of an apex court using emergency procedures to enable contested executive action affecting electoral administration.

Read it here.